Next: Basic detector performance
Up: Detector simulation
Previous: Detector simulation
  Contents
Several important issues in the detector optimization and data analysis have
to be addressed by Monte Carlo simulation.
- Basic detector performance. A Monte Carlo program GMu based on Geant3
was developed which includes the main detector components of the proposed
setup and tracks individual
-e decay sequences. It establishes
the expected detector performance and defines the granularity required in
the tracking devices.
- Simulation of overlapping events. Extensive
studies of systematics associated with the reconstruction of overlapping
events were performed with a simplified detector model, which allowed the
generation and analysis of statistics samples of 10
events with
relatively modest means. These studies revealed subtle correlated losses
(``double kill'') and are documented in report [2]. In the
mean time we have drastically simplified the experimental strategy by avoiding
electron tracking in the TPC for the main data sample. Accordingly the systematic
problems discussed in this earlier report are significantly eleviated.
- Simulation of specific physics processes. This includes mainly issues related
to the physical processes of muonic hydrogen atoms relevant for the experiment,
in particular diffusion of
and
atoms and related fusion
processes. Some of these results are presented in section 5.4.3.
- Distortions and background to high statistics time distributions. Their effect
was studied by generating analytical expressions of the expected time distributions
with appropriate disturbing effects, then smearing these ideal data points with
Monte Carlo statistics and finally fitting them to quantify the effect on the
lifetime measurement. Examples of this kind are studies of the effect of
diffusion, accidental background and
oscillations.
Figure 21:
Simulated event showing the different detector components included in the present
Monte Carlo. The dashed lines are unobserved neutrinos.
|
|
These simulation studies will be further refined during the construction period
of the final
detector. The main work will concentrate on detailed
modeling of the detector response and the integration of the above mentioned
special physics processes, not covered in Geant, into GMu. Furthermore the GMu
generated data has to be mapped onto the event-block structure of the final
experiment, so that the whole analysis chain is applied to and tested with MC
data. In this way the following issues will be investigated:
- Detailed studies of overlapping events (local pile-up free events).
The analysis of overlapping events inherently is more complex, than that
of single muon events (global pile-up free events). The time dependence of the
efficiency due to two-event
correlations has to be carefully modeled and compared to the data. Effects will
be visualized with limited statistics by deteriorating critical parameters (like
detection inefficiencies etc.) compared to the expected performance.
- The selection cuts and efficiency for special classes of sub-events (like diffusion
etc.) should be optimized with Monte Carlo and compared to the data, to improve
the microscopic understanding of the detector.
- Brute force Monte Carlo simulation of 10
events is a major task.
The current GMu generates about 3x10
events/day on a 800 MHz Pentium.
Thus about 5000 CPU days are required to obtain a 10 ppm statistics of reconstructed
events. Such a calculation seems feasible at the Cray-T3E of the National Energy
Research Center at LBNL, where the UC Berkeley group has an approved grant for
this project. However, such an effort can only be made for the final analysis
and even there the benefits of a full simulation have to be weighted against
more direct experimental consistency checks. A problem, where medium scale computation
is informative, is the local pile-up analysis. For that case, a large statistics
can be generated by mixing events from a limited pool of fully simulated GMu
events. The track reconstruction problems resulting from topologically overlapping
events and potentially associated detector efficiencies and dead times can be
studied with high precision by generating the random event ordering and some
less CPU-intensive event properties (like decay time) during the mixing stage.
(We have demonstrated this method in Ref. [21].)
Next: Basic detector performance
Up: Detector simulation
Previous: Detector simulation
  Contents
Peter Kammel
2001-02-04