NEXT
User name Spayde
Log entry time 20:24:44 on December 12, 2003
Entry number 70848
keyword=Run Coordinator Report for 12 December 2003
Run Coordinator's Report - 12 December 2003 18:20
General Comments/Problems/New Information
Had some success in taking data on swing and owl shifts but were
essentially without beam for all of day shift again. Some welcome
news came out of the owl shift (see below).
Problems
- The Hall C chopper slit is defunct so we are now getting our beam
through the Hall A chopper slit. This means that we will be without
beam for 8 hours Sunday day shift while the MCC runs an energy spread
minimization program to Hall A. There will likely be a long access on
Monday to repair this and install other equipment in the
injector.
- Some of the data taken on owl shift was with the DAQ in
"ts_scaler" mode rather than "ts_full". This means there is no French
TE or Fastbus data for those runs. The DAQ should never be
in "ts_scaler" mode unless explicitly called for in the run plan. If
you do switch to "ts_scaler" make sure you switch back to "ts_full" at
the completion of your program. Here are the nominal settings we
should be using on the DAQ.
- Configuration mode in runControl GUI should be "ts_full", not
"ts_scaler
- G0 DAQ Configuration Tool GUI
- 30 Hz mode enabled.
- Fastbus prescaler (PS4) = 5000
- Fast clear disabled
- GMS prescaler (PS5) = maximized
- NA CFD threshold setting = 7
- NA CFD width setting = 0
- DMCH Reference Config = Threshold-FiB_Buddy-NPN-ON-50mV
- A couple of hours of beam were lost this afternoon because the
operators were trying to tune to old nominal beam positions in the
hall. Once the mistake was discovered by our shift crew beam was
recovered rapidly. I'll follow up on this with the PD tomorrow. For
informational purposes the nominal beam positions in the hall are in
g0log 70558.
New Information
- We need to specify what data we are taking when we ask the MCC to
reduce the beam current below 40 uA: Moller or other (say
background). They use the slits to reduce current for the Moller and
reduce laser power in all other instances. If there is an indication
that there are tails on the beam after reducing the current with the
laser, then you can ask them to tweak the prebuncher setting a
little. We should start paying more attention to halo rates I think
as an indication of beam tails.
- In order to take data on the tungsten radiator we will probably have
to take an access and reset the target FSD box so that the "target in"
position is centered on the radiator rather than LH2. This means we
have to group all of our radiator runs into long blocks because we
will not be allowed to do this often. This situation will be remedied
after the new year when a new FSD box arrives that allows for multiple
target positions.
Past 24 Hours
Swing
Shift started waiting for beam while the MCC completed the daily G0
Beam Health Checkup and ran a 30 Hz PZT test (the test failed and
further tests have been suspended pending a resolution). When beam
was given to the hall Greg Smith commissioned the tungsten radiator
(g0log 70699)
while Paul and Dominique did DAQ test involving the 9th DMCH board (70745).
The flyswatter had been put in during day shift access so we tried to
take hour long runs on radiator+FS (successful) and LH2+FS (failed due
to loss of beam). At this point the MCC began diagnosing problems
with the chopper slit that eventually caused us to move to the Hall A
chopper slit (elog 1185419). The flyswatter was removed and there was
no more beam swing shift.
Owl
Beam came back at roughly 02:30 at which point Kaz was in
to do RHWP/IA/PZT scans and start the beam feedback. A different
approach was taken to setting the RHWP where essentially the position
difference that we have little control over was minimized rather than
the charge asymmetry (details are slightly more complex but that is
the gist). We then took long feedback runs for the rest of the shift
with very promising results (g0log 70795
and 70821).
Over a period of about three hours we were able to control the
position differences to less than 20 nm. These feedback runs were
taken with the LH2 target in so we have some TE data on LH2.
Unfortunately, these were the runs taken in "ts_scaler" rather than
"ts_full" so there is no French time encoding or Fastbus data. Also
attempted to take a long run on the radiator but were not allowed to
do so by the MCC. The problem is that mentioned above; that by
default the target in FSD position is LH2. Without resetting the FSD
box it is necessary to mask the target FSD. This cannot be done
without also masking the ion chambers and the magnet vacuum which is
not a safe mode for the machine or the experiment to operate in.
Day
The day shift was lost to the switch from the Hall C chopper slit to
the Hall A chopper slit. There appear to have been issues with coming
back up from that. Also, as mentioned previously a couple of hours
were lost due to the attempt to tune to incorrect nominal positions in
the hall.
Future Plans
Friday Swing/Saturday Owl
- Deadtime studies that were punted from the previous swing.
- Another RHWP/IA/PZT scan followed by more long runs. This will be
capped by another IA/PZT/RHWP scan to check stability of the
calibration parameters.
- Time permitting the flyswatter will be put back in to get the
LH2+FS data that were punted on the previous swing. Will take hour
long runs at two magnet currents (5000 A and 4500 A).
Saturday Day
Moller Systematics
Saturday Swing
- Deadtime studies.
- Another RHWP/IA/PZT scan followed by more long runs. This will be
capped by another IA/PZT/RHWP scan to check stability of the
calibration parameters.
Sunday Owl
Continuation of previous shift program or the CFD threshold program
necessary for Q2 and centering.
Sunday Day
Hall A energy spread minimization will be going on so there will be
no beam. We will use the opportunity to access the hall for GMS
checkout and TLD removal.
Sunday Swing
- Halo target centering
- Halo monitor calibration
- Target density test